[ Story · STORY ]

Fed opens stablecoin rulebook for comment

The Fed's GENIUS Act proposals set full-reserve rules and a bank application path for stablecoin issuers it supervises.

STORY·September 24, 2026·3 min read·By Gintautas Nekrosius
A cream field with a single red ledger stamp pressed onto a stack of flat coin-less tokens, negative space above
A rulebook, not a ban: the Fed drafts the fence around bank-issued stablecoins.

The Federal Reserve opened two rulemakings on September 24 under the GENIUS Act. One sets reserve and capital standards for stablecoin issuers it supervises. The other builds an application process for banks that want to issue their own tokens.

Both are comment-period proposals, not final rules. But they draw the first hard lines around who gets to issue a dollar-pegged token inside the regulated banking system, and what they have to hold against it.

The reserve mandate

The core requirement is simple to state and hard to game: full backing with safe, liquid assets. No fractional reserves, no yield-bearing side bets counted as collateral.

The numbers in the filing show how tight the Fed wants this drawn:

  • The Fed opened public comment on two GENIUS Act proposals on September 24, 2026, per Decrypt.
  • One proposal covers reserve and capital rules for issuers under Fed supervision.
  • The second creates a formal bank application track for stablecoin issuance.
  • GENIUS Act, the enabling statute, passed in 2025 and set up federal oversight of payment stablecoins.

Who actually applies

The default read is a compliance story: stablecoins finally get bank-grade guardrails. That's true, but it undersells who benefits.

A formal application process is a moat for anyone who can staff a legal team and clear capital thresholds. Small issuers can't.

Banks that already hold trust charters, custody relationships and balance sheets built for capital rules gain a straight lane into stablecoin issuance. That's the incumbents.

Non-bank issuers face a choice: partner with a supervised bank, or stay outside the perimeter and lose access to the customers and rails that come with Fed sign-off.

The full-reserve requirement compounds this. Safe-asset backing at scale costs money to source and custody.

Firms with existing Treasury desks and repo access absorb that cost more easily than a startup building reserve management from scratch. The proposals don't ban competition. They price it.

What confirms the read

The comment period is where this either narrows or widens. Watch who shows up and what they ask for.

  • The comment period's length and close date, once the Fed publishes it in the Federal Register.
  • Whether large banks (JPMorgan, Citi, regional trust banks) file applications in the first cohort versus fintech issuers.
  • Any capital ratio or liquidity coverage threshold the final rule sets, and whether it tracks existing bank capital rules or sets a separate bar.

Gintautas Nekrosius is the founder and editor of Stack and Story. He spent more than a decade in technology and crypto, including senior marketing roles at companies in the Animoca Brands and NordVPN groups, and worked on token launches and go-to-market from the inside. He started Stack and Story to write the independent read he could not find: crypto and markets explained plainly, by someone who has seen how the machine works. The publication holds no tokens and takes no trades.

DisclosureStack and Story holds no position in the assets discussed and earns nothing from their movement. This is analysis, not financial advice. Do your own research.

Understand crypto. Decide for yourself.

The numbers that moved, and the reason they did, every Sunday, free.

Free · Independent · Unsubscribe anytime · Privacy