Orionx shuts down over $7M custody gap
Tether-backed Chilean exchange Orionx is closing after an audit found $7M in client assets moved outside its custody, with transfers dating to 2018.

Orionx, the Chilean exchange Tether led into a Series A just 15 months ago, is shutting down for good. A forensic audit found more than $7 million in customer assets sitting in wallets the company never controlled, and Orionx has filed a criminal complaint against its own co-founders.
The custody mismatch
Orionx says its books showed balances that onchain records could not back up, across four assets. The gap wasn't a hack or a market swing. It was a mismatch between what the ledger said and what the wallets held.
- More than $7 million in customer assets moved to wallets outside Orionx's custody, per the company's announcement.
- The shortfall spans Bitcoin, Ether, XRP and Polygon balances, according to the forensic audit cited by Cointelegraph.
- Transfers allegedly occurred between 2018 and 2021, years before detection, per Orionx's criminal complaint reported by La Tercera.
- One wallet allegedly linked to co-founder Joaquín Díaz received over $1.5 million across 14 transfers, La Tercera reports.
- A separate wallet allegedly received 187 ETH, 4.1 million USDT and 200,000 USDC from Orionx's custody, per the same complaint.
- Tether led Orionx's Series A in June 2025, roughly four years after the alleged transfers ended.
What the gap actually reveals
The obvious framing is a hack or an insider heist that finally caught up with a small regional exchange. The real story is a due diligence failure that predates Tether's own check.
Tether invested in June 2025. The alleged transfers ran from 2018 to 2021, meaning the discrepancy sat in Orionx's books for as long as four years before any audit surfaced it, through a Series A round and past Tether's own screening.
A Chilean fintech law compliance review, not a security incident, is what finally forced the forensic audit that found the gap. That's a regulatory trigger doing the work an institutional investor's diligence didn't.
The co-founders named in the complaint deny wrongdoing and say the cause of the shortfall is still unclear. That leaves two live possibilities: insider diversion, or a custody architecture so loose that funds could leave without anyone noticing for years.
Either reading makes the same point about Tether's Latin America expansion strategy. Backing platforms before their books can withstand a compliance-driven audit carries a cost that shows up only after the money's already gone.
What to watch
- Whether the forensic audit or any court filing narrows down exactly when the $7 million left custody, beyond the 2018-2021 window.
- How much of the $7 million Orionx actually recovers for clients, since withdrawals remain suspended with no stated timeline.
- Whether Tether discloses what its June 2025 due diligence process reviewed, or issues any statement beyond taking down its original investment announcement.
